中重核中单粒子与集体运动的竞争效应(英文)

亓冲

doi:10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

中重核中单粒子与集体运动的竞争效应(英文)

亓冲

文章导航 > 原子核物理评论 > 2018 > 35(4): 420-428

亓冲. 中重核中单粒子与集体运动的竞争效应(英文)[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2018, 35(4): 420-428. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

引用本文:

亓冲. 中重核中单粒子与集体运动的竞争效应(英文)[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2018, 35(4): 420-428. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

QI Chong. Competition Between the Single-particle Seniority Regime and Collective Motion in Intermediate-mass Nuclei[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2018, 35(4): 420-428. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

Citation:

QI Chong. Competition Between the Single-particle Seniority Regime and Collective Motion in Intermediate-mass Nuclei[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2018, 35(4): 420-428. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

中重核中单粒子与集体运动的竞争效应(英文)

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

亓冲

瑞典皇家工学院物理系, 瑞典斯德哥尔摩 100691

基金项目: 瑞典研究理事会项目（621-2012-3805，621-2013-4323）；Göran Gustafsson基金杰出青年项目

详细信息

中图分类号: O571.6;P142.9

Competition Between the Single-particle Seniority Regime and Collective Motion in Intermediate-mass Nuclei

QI Chong

KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

Funds: Swedish Research Council (VR) (621-2012-3805, 621-2013-4323) and Göran Gustafsson Foundation.

摘要: 从原子核的电四极跃迁强度B（E2）中可以提取出原子核集体性和单粒子性质竞争的重要信息，其中一个重要的观测量是B（E2；4₁⁺ →2₁⁺）/B（E2；2₁⁺ →g.s.）的比值（B_4/2）。B_4/2一般要大于1，而且对于原子核转动和振动，我们应有B_4/2=1.4和2.0，但球形半满壳核一般会有不一样的性质。这些核的性质主要受对关联效应影响。介绍了几种超出我们一般认识的奇特衰变性质。Te同位素的基态带有鲜明的振动特性，但¹¹⁴Te的E2跃迁性质却更符合转动性。这些性质可以通过大规模壳模型计算来描述。对于填充j=9/2轨道的半满壳核，它们的4⁺和6⁺显示出很强的辛若数部分守恒性质。这种奇特的部分守恒可以被解析证明。而且我们的计算表明辛若数部分守恒对相关的E2跃迁影响很大。对于N=90附近具有量子相变行为的核素，其B_4/2也会也表现出相似的奇异特性。

The E2 transition strength, B(E2), gives particularly precise information on the competition between the collective and single-particle degree of freedom. An important observable to study the development of collectivity is the B(E2; 4₁⁺ →2₁⁺)/B(E2; 2₁⁺ →g.s.) (B_4/2). The B_4/2 ratio is usually greater than unity. These values are 1.4 and 2.0 for an ideal rotor and a vibrator, respectively. Whereas the seniority scheme usually leads to different behaviours. In this contribution I will show examples that contrast with our standard understanding. The yrast spectra of Te isotopes show a vibrational-like equally-spaced pattern but the few known E2 transitions show anomalous rotational-like behaviour, which cannot be reproduced by collective models. Large-scale shell model calculations reproduce well the equally-spaced spectra of those isotopes as well as the constant behaviour of the B(E2) values in ¹¹⁴Te. For nuclei involving protons or neutrons in j=9/2 orbitals, the partial conservation of seniority can lead to dramatic changes to the E2 decay pattern that have never been seen before. The B_4/2 ratios in quantum phase transitional nuclei around N=90 also show a similar exotic feature.
- 电磁跃迁 /
- 壳模型 /
- 辛若数 /
- 集体性
Abstract: The E2 transition strength, B(E2), gives particularly precise information on the competition between the collective and single-particle degree of freedom. An important observable to study the development of collectivity is the B(E2; 4₁⁺ →2₁⁺)/B(E2; 2₁⁺ →g.s.) (B_4/2). The B_4/2 ratio is usually greater than unity. These values are 1.4 and 2.0 for an ideal rotor and a vibrator, respectively. Whereas the seniority scheme usually leads to different behaviours. In this contribution I will show examples that contrast with our standard understanding. The yrast spectra of Te isotopes show a vibrational-like equally-spaced pattern but the few known E2 transitions show anomalous rotational-like behaviour, which cannot be reproduced by collective models. Large-scale shell model calculations reproduce well the equally-spaced spectra of those isotopes as well as the constant behaviour of the B(E2) values in ¹¹⁴Te. For nuclei involving protons or neutrons in j=9/2 orbitals, the partial conservation of seniority can lead to dramatic changes to the E2 decay pattern that have never been seen before. The B_4/2 ratios in quantum phase transitional nuclei around N=90 also show a similar exotic feature.
- electromagnetic transition /
- shell model /
- seniority /
- collectivity

[1]	MÖLLER O, WARR N, JOLIE J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2005, 71:064324.
[2]	CAKIRLI R B, CASTEN R F, JOLIE J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2004, 70:047302.
[3]	BÄCK T, QI C, CEDERWALL B, et al. Phys Rev C, 2013, 87:031306.
[4]	XU Z X, QI C. Phys Lett B, 2013, 724:247.
[5]	JIAO L F, SUN Z H, XU Z X, et al. Phys Rev C, 2014, 90:024306.
[6]	QI C, JIA L Y, FU G J. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94:014312.
[7]	QI C. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2016, 742:012030.
[8]	ANDREYEV A N. Phys Rev Lett, 2013, 110:242502.
[9]	QI C, ANDREYEV A N, HUYSE M, et al. Phys Lett B, 2014, 734:203.
[10]	WANG F, SUN B H, LIU Z, et al. Phys Rev C, 2017, 96:064307.
[11]	WANG F. Phys Lett B, 2017, 770:83.
[12]	TALMI I. Simple Models of Complex Nuclei:The Shell Model and Interacting Boson Model[M]. Amsterdam:Harwood Academic Publishers, 1993.
[13]	VAN ISACKER P, HEINZE S. Annals of Physics, 2014, 349:73
[14]	QI C. Phys Rev C, 2010, 81, 034318.
[15]	ROWE D J, ROSENSTEEL G. Phys Rev Lett, 2001, 87:172501.
[16]	ROSENSTEEL G, ROWE D J. Phys Rev C, 2003, 67:014303.
[17]	QI C, WANG X B, XU Z X, et al. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82:014304.
[18]	ESCUDEROS A, ZAMICK L. Phys Rev C, 2006, 73:044302.
[19]	VAN ISACKER P. Nuclear Physics News, 2014, 24:23.
[20]	ZAMICK L. Phys Rev C, 2007, 75:064305.
[21]	QI C, XU Z X, LIOTTA R J. Nucl Phys A, 2012, 884:21.
[22]	VAN ISACKER P, HEINZE S. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 100:052501.
[23]	QI C. Phys Rev C, 2011, 83:014307.
[24]	LEVIATAN A. Prog Part Nucl Phys, 2011, 66:93.
[25]	VAN ISACKER P. Int J Mod Phys E, 2011, 20:191.
[26]	MORALES A I. Phys Rev C, 2016, 93:034328.
[27]	WATANABE H. Phys Rev Lett, 2013, 111:152501.
[28]	SIMPSON G S. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 113:132502.
[29]	GOTTARDO A. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 109:162502.
[30]	QIAN Y B. QI C. Phys Rev C, 2018, 98:061303.
[31]	QI C. Phys Lett B, 2017, 773:616.
[32]	HONMA M, OTSUKA T, MIZUSAKI T, et al. Phys Rev C, 2009, 80:064323.
[33]	LISETSKIY A F, BROWN B A, HOROI M, et al. Phys Rev C, 2004, 70:044314.
[34]	BLOMQVIST J, RYDSTRÖM L. Physica Scripta, 1985, 31:31.
[35]	QI C. Phys Lett B, 2012, 717:436.
[36]	JIA L Y, QI C. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94:044312.
[37]	QI C, CHEN T. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92:051304.
[38]	CHANGIZI S, QI C, WYSS R. Nucl Phys A, 2015, 940:210.
[39]	XU Z X, QI C, BLOMQVIST J, et al. Nucl Phys A, 2012, 877:51.
[40]	JIANG H, QI C, LEI Y, et al. Phys Rev C, 2013, 88:044332.
[41]	BANU A. Phys Rev C, 2005, 72:061305.
[42]	CORSI A. Phys Lett B, 2015, 743:451.
[43]	CEDERKÄLL J. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98:172501.
[44]	CERIZZA G. Phys Rev C, 2016, 93:021601.
[45]	EKSTRÖM A. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 101:012502.
[46]	DOORNENBAL P. Phys Rev C, 2014, 90:061302.
[47]	JUNGCLAUS A. Phys Lett B, 2011, 695:110.
[48]	GUASTALLA G. Phys Rev Lett, 2013, 110:172501.
[49]	ALLMOND J. M. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92:041303
[50]	SPIEKER M. Phys Lett B, 2016, 752:102.
[51]	PELLEGRI L. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92:014330.
[52]	FAESTERMANN T, GORSKA M, GRAWE H. Prog Part Nucl Phys, 2013, 69:85.
[53]	ANSARI A, RING P. Phys Lett B, 2007, 649:128.
[54]	LO IUDICE N, STOYANOV C., TARPANOV D. Phys Rev C, 2011, 84:044314.
[55]	MORALES I O, VAN ISACKER P, TALMI I. Phys Lett B, 2011, 703:606.
[56]	JIANG H, LEI Y, QI C, et al. Phys Rev C, 2014, 89:014320.
[57]	JIANG H, LEI Y, FU G J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2012, 86:054304.
[58]	CORAGGIO L, COVELLO A, GARGANO A, et al. Phys Rev C, 2015, 91:041301.
[59]	ENGELAND T, HJORTH-JENSEN M, KARTAMYSHEV M, et al. Nucl Phys A, 2014, 928:51.
[60]	QI C, XU Z X. Phys Rev C, 2012, 86:044323.
[61]	SAXENA M. Phys Rev C, 2014, 90:024316.
[62]	HADINIA B. Phys Rev C, 2004, 70:031302
[63]	HADINIA B. Phys Rev C, 2005, 72:041303.
[64]	SANDZELIUS M. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 99:022501.
[65]	DELION D S, WYSS R, LIOTTA R J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82:024307.
[66]	SEWERYNIAK D. Phys Rev C, 2006, 73:061301.
[67]	LIDDICK S N. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 97:082501.
[68]	CEDERWALL B. Nature, 2011, 469:68.
[69]	FRAUENDORF S, MACCHIAVELLI A. Prog Part Nucl Phys, 2014, 78:24.
[70]	QI C, BLOMQVIST J, BÄCK T, et al. Phys Rev C, 2011, 84:021301.
[71]	QI C, WYSS R. Physica Scripta, 2016, 91:013009.
[72]	BÄCK T. Phys Rev C, 2011, 84:041306.
[73]	DONCEL M. Phys Rev C, 2015, 91:061304.
[74]	HINKE C B, BÖHMER M, BOUTACHKOV P, et al. Nature, 2012, 486:341.
[75]	CAURIER E, NOWACKI F, POVES A, et al. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82:064304.
[76]	WU Z Y, QI C, WYSS R, et al. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92:024306.
[77]	COELLO PÉREZ E A, PAPENBROCK T. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92:064309.
[78]	DOMBRÁDI Z. Phys Rev C, 1995, 51:2394.
[79]	DONCEL M. Phys Rev C, 2017, 95:044321.
[80]	QI C. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94:034310.
[81]	DONCEL M, BÄCK T, QI C, et al. Phys Rev C, 2017, 96:051304.
[82]	PROCTER M G. Phys Lett B, 2011, 704:118.
[83]	PROCTER M G. Phys Rev C, 2012, 86:034308.
[84]	CEDERWALL B, DONCEL M, AKTAS O, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 121:022502.
[85]	GRAHN T. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94:044327.
[86]	CARROLL R J. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94:064311.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 952
HTML全文浏览量: 79
PDF下载量: 92
被引次数: 0

中重核中单粒子与集体运动的竞争效应(英文)

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.04.420

亓冲

瑞典皇家工学院物理系, 瑞典斯德哥尔摩 100691

基金项目: 瑞典研究理事会项目（621-2012-3805，621-2013-4323）；Göran Gustafsson基金杰出青年项目

收稿日期: 2018-10-18
刊出日期: 2020-05-03

中图分类号: O571.6;P142.9

关键词:

电磁跃迁 /

壳模型 /

辛若数 /

集体性

摘要: 从原子核的电四极跃迁强度B（E2）中可以提取出原子核集体性和单粒子性质竞争的重要信息，其中一个重要的观测量是B（E2；4₁⁺ →2₁⁺）/B（E2；2₁⁺ →g.s.）的比值（B_4/2）。B_4/2一般要大于1，而且对于原子核转动和振动，我们应有B_4/2=1.4和2.0，但球形半满壳核一般会有不一样的性质。这些核的性质主要受对关联效应影响。介绍了几种超出我们一般认识的奇特衰变性质。Te同位素的基态带有鲜明的振动特性，但¹¹⁴Te的E2跃迁性质却更符合转动性。这些性质可以通过大规模壳模型计算来描述。对于填充j=9/2轨道的半满壳核，它们的4⁺和6⁺显示出很强的辛若数部分守恒性质。这种奇特的部分守恒可以被解析证明。而且我们的计算表明辛若数部分守恒对相关的E2跃迁影响很大。对于N=90附近具有量子相变行为的核素，其B_4/2也会也表现出相似的奇异特性。

The E2 transition strength, B(E2), gives particularly precise information on the competition between the collective and single-particle degree of freedom. An important observable to study the development of collectivity is the B(E2; 4₁⁺ →2₁⁺)/B(E2; 2₁⁺ →g.s.) (B_4/2). The B_4/2 ratio is usually greater than unity. These values are 1.4 and 2.0 for an ideal rotor and a vibrator, respectively. Whereas the seniority scheme usually leads to different behaviours. In this contribution I will show examples that contrast with our standard understanding. The yrast spectra of Te isotopes show a vibrational-like equally-spaced pattern but the few known E2 transitions show anomalous rotational-like behaviour, which cannot be reproduced by collective models. Large-scale shell model calculations reproduce well the equally-spaced spectra of those isotopes as well as the constant behaviour of the B(E2) values in ¹¹⁴Te. For nuclei involving protons or neutrons in j=9/2 orbitals, the partial conservation of seniority can lead to dramatic changes to the E2 decay pattern that have never been seen before. The B_4/2 ratios in quantum phase transitional nuclei around N=90 also show a similar exotic feature.