高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究

陈梦华 王宁

陈梦华, 王宁. Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
引用本文: 陈梦华, 王宁. Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
CHEN Menghua, WANG Ning. Statistical Errors in Weizsäcker-Skyrme Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
Citation: CHEN Menghua, WANG Ning. Statistical Errors in Weizsäcker-Skyrme Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111

Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
基金项目: 广西自然科学基金资助项目(2015GXNSFDA139004);广西研究生教育创新计划项目(YCSW2018088)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈梦华(1993-),男,广东韶关人,硕士研究生,从事原子核物理研究;E-mail:physcmh@163.com

    通讯作者: 王宁,E-mail:wangning@gxnu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: O571.53

Statistical Errors in Weizsäcker-Skyrme Mass Model

Funds: Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2015GXNSFDA139004); Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (YCSW2018088)
  • 摘要: 基于最大值近似估算的方法,系统地研究了Weizsäcker-Skyrme(WS4)核质量模型的参数不确定性,并计算了WS4核质量模型理论预言值的统计误差。WS4核质量模型的理论预言值与实验值的偏差基本都小于模型的统计误差,表明采用最大值近似估算法对WS4核质量模型理论预言的统计误差的分析是简捷而有效的。进一步研究了WS4核质量模型理论计算中最敏感的参数,结果表明,对称能系数相关的两个参数csymκ对中子滴线附近的原子核质量有重要影响。此外还对WS4模型与WS*模型的参数不确定性及统计误差进行了对比研究,WS4模型中各模型参数的不确定性比WS*模型中相应模型参数的不确定性降低了10%~ 50%。


    The statistical uncertainties of 15 model parameters in the Weizsäcker-Skyrme(WS4) mass model are investigated with an efficient approach, and the propagated errors in the predicted masses are estimated. The discrepancies between the predicted masses and the experimental data are almost all smaller than the model errors. The most sensitive model parameter which causes the largest statistical error is analyzed for all bound nuclei. We find that the two coefficients of symmetry energy term significantly influence the mass predictions of extremely neutron-rich nuclei. In addition, the parameter uncertainties and statistical errors of the WS4 mass model and the WS* mass model are compared. The uncertainties of model parameter in the WS4 mass model is reduced by 10% ~ 50% compared with the WS* mass model.
  • [1] CWIOK S, HEENEN P H, NAZAREWICZ W. Nature, 2005, 433:705.
    [2] SOBICZEWSKI A, POMORSKI K. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 2007, 58:292.
    [3] LU Bingnan, ZHAO Enguang, ZHOU Shangui. Physical Review C, 2012, 85:011301(R).
    [4] SOBICZEWSKI A. Journal of Physics G:Nuclear and Particle Physics, 2016, 43:095106.
    [5] OGANESSIAN Y T, UTYONKOV V K. Nuclear Physics A, 2015, 944:62.
    [6] WANG Y Z, Wang S J, HOU Z Y, et al. Physical Review C, 2015, 92:064301.
    [7] LI Baoan, CHEN Liewen, KO Mingche. Physics Reports, 2008, 464:113.
    [8] LIU Min, WANG Ning, LI Zhuxia, et al. Physical Review C, 2010, 82:064306.
    [9] DANIELEWICZ P, LEE J. Nuclear Physics A, 2014, 922:1.
    [10] JIANG H, WANG N, CHEN Liewen, et al. Physical Review C, 2015, 91:054302.
    [11] WANG Ning, LIU Min, OU Li, et al. Physics Letters B, 2015, 751:553.
    [12] MOLLER P, MYERS W D, SAGAWA H, et al. Physical Review Letters, 2012, 108:052501.
    [13] MOLLER P, NIX J R, MYERS W D, et al. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 1995, 59:185.
    [14] WANG Ning, LIU Min, WU Xizhen. Physical Review C, 2010, 81:044322.
    [15] MO Qiuhong, LIU Min, WANG Ning. Physical Review C, 2014, 90:024320.
    [16] LIU Min, WANG Ning, DENG Yangge, et al. Physical Review C, 2011, 84:014333.
    [17] WANG Ning, LIANG Zuoying, LIU Min, et al. Physical Review C, 2010, 82:044304.
    [18] WANG Ning, LIU Min, WU Xizhen, et al. Physics Letters B, 2014, 734:215.
    [19] WANG Ning, LIU Min. Chin Sci Bull, 2015, 60:1145. (in Chinese) (王宁, 刘敏. 科学通报, 2015, 60:1145.)
    [20] GORIELY S, SAMYN M, PEARSON J M. Physical Review C, 2007, 75:064312.
    [21] GORIELY S, CHAMEL N, PEARSON J M. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 102:152503.
    [22] DUFLO J, ZUKER A P. Physical Review C, 1995, 52:R23.
    [23] WANG Meng, AUDI G, KONDEV F G, et al. Chinese Physics C, 2017, 41(3):030003.
    [24] CHEN Menghua, LIU Min, WANG Ning. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 36(1):1. (in Chinese) (陈梦华, 刘敏, 王宁. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 36(1):1.)
    [25] WANG Ning, LIU Min, JIANG H, et al. Physical Review C, 2015, 91:044308.
    [26] GAO Y, DOBACZEWSKI J, KORTELAINEN M, et al. Physical Review C, 2013, 87:034324.
    [27] ERLER J, REINHARD P G. Journal of Physics G:Nuclear and Particle Physics, 2015, 42:034026.
    [28] ROCA-MAZA X, PAAR N, COLO G. Journal of Physics G:Nuclear and Particle Physics, 2015, 42:034033.
    [29] YUAN Cenxi. Physical Review C, 2016, 93:034310.
    [30] WANG Ning, LIU Min, WU Xizhen, et al. Physics Letters B, 2014, 734:215.
    [31] WANG Meng, AUDI G, WAPSTRA A H, et al. Chinese Physics C, 2012, 36(12):1603.
    [32] LIU Min, GAO Yu, WANG Ning. Chinese physics C, 2017, 41(11):114101.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1398
  • HTML全文浏览量:  163
  • PDF下载量:  151
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-04-17
  • 修回日期:  2018-05-14
  • 刊出日期:  2018-06-20

Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
    基金项目:  广西自然科学基金资助项目(2015GXNSFDA139004);广西研究生教育创新计划项目(YCSW2018088)
    作者简介:

    陈梦华(1993-),男,广东韶关人,硕士研究生,从事原子核物理研究;E-mail:physcmh@163.com

    通讯作者: 王宁,E-mail:wangning@gxnu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: O571.53

摘要: 基于最大值近似估算的方法,系统地研究了Weizsäcker-Skyrme(WS4)核质量模型的参数不确定性,并计算了WS4核质量模型理论预言值的统计误差。WS4核质量模型的理论预言值与实验值的偏差基本都小于模型的统计误差,表明采用最大值近似估算法对WS4核质量模型理论预言的统计误差的分析是简捷而有效的。进一步研究了WS4核质量模型理论计算中最敏感的参数,结果表明,对称能系数相关的两个参数csymκ对中子滴线附近的原子核质量有重要影响。此外还对WS4模型与WS*模型的参数不确定性及统计误差进行了对比研究,WS4模型中各模型参数的不确定性比WS*模型中相应模型参数的不确定性降低了10%~ 50%。


The statistical uncertainties of 15 model parameters in the Weizsäcker-Skyrme(WS4) mass model are investigated with an efficient approach, and the propagated errors in the predicted masses are estimated. The discrepancies between the predicted masses and the experimental data are almost all smaller than the model errors. The most sensitive model parameter which causes the largest statistical error is analyzed for all bound nuclei. We find that the two coefficients of symmetry energy term significantly influence the mass predictions of extremely neutron-rich nuclei. In addition, the parameter uncertainties and statistical errors of the WS4 mass model and the WS* mass model are compared. The uncertainties of model parameter in the WS4 mass model is reduced by 10% ~ 50% compared with the WS* mass model.

English Abstract

陈梦华, 王宁. Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
引用本文: 陈梦华, 王宁. Weizsäcker-Skyrme核质量模型的统计误差研究[J]. 原子核物理评论, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
CHEN Menghua, WANG Ning. Statistical Errors in Weizsäcker-Skyrme Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
Citation: CHEN Menghua, WANG Ning. Statistical Errors in Weizsäcker-Skyrme Mass Model[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2018, 35(2): 111-118. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.35.02.111
参考文献 (32)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回