Advanced Search
Volume 34 Issue 1
Jan.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

FENG Hongtao. Several Controversial Issues of QED3[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 13-15. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.013
Citation: FENG Hongtao. Several Controversial Issues of QED3[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 13-15. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.013

Several Controversial Issues of QED3

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.013
Funds:  Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (2242014R30011)
  • Received Date: 2016-09-20
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-10-11
  • Publish Date: 2017-03-20
  • Quantum electrodynamics in (2+1) dimensions (QED3) is an important nonperturbative system. This seems relatively simple Abel system, there are several issues that need to be clarified: whether or not the partition function of the system depends on chemical potential; whether or not there exists dynamical chiral symmetric breaking; whether or not the boson can acquires nonzero mass. In this paper, we give an in sight of the traits of QED3 from the dependence of density, temperature and massive boson to discuss those problems.
  • [1] BURDEN C J, PRASCHIFKA J, ROBERTS C D. Phys Rev D, 1992, 46: 2695.
    [2] MARIS P. Phys Rev D, 1995, 52: 6087.
    [3] GRIGNANI G, SEMENOFF G, SODANO P. Phys Rev D, 1996, 53: 7157.
    [4] MARIS P. Phys Rev D, 1996, 54: 4049.
    [5] BASHIR A, RAYA A, CLOET I C, ROBERTS C D. Phys Rev C, 2008, 78: 055201.
    [6] WEN X G, ZEE A. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69: 1811.
    [7] RANTNER W, WEN X G. Phys Rev Lett, 2001, 86, 3871.
    [8] FRANZ M, TESANOVIC Z. Phys Rev Lett, 2001, 87: 257003.
    [9] LIU G Z, CHENG G. Phys Rev B, 2002, 66: 100505.
    [10] HERBUT I F. Phys Rev Lett, 2002, 88: 047006; HERBUT I F. Phys Rev B, 2002, 66: 094504; HERBUT I F. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 237001.
    [11] BARBOUR I, BEHILIL N E. Nucl. Phys B, 1986, 275[FS17]: 296.
    [12] NARAYANAN R. Phys Rev D, 2012, 86: 087701.
    [13] BURDEN C J, PRASCHIFKA J, ROBERTS C D. Phys Rev D, 1992, 46: 2695.
    [14] GRIGNANI G, SEMENO G, SODANO P. Phys Rev D, 1996, 53: 7157.
    [15] KLEINERT H, NOGUEIRA F S, SUDBO A. Nucl. Phys B, 2003, 666: 361.
    [16] FRADKIN E, SHENKER S H, Phys Rev D, 1979, 19: 3682.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1642) PDF downloads(119) Cited by()

Proportional views

Several Controversial Issues of QED3

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.013
Funds:  Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (2242014R30011)

Abstract: Quantum electrodynamics in (2+1) dimensions (QED3) is an important nonperturbative system. This seems relatively simple Abel system, there are several issues that need to be clarified: whether or not the partition function of the system depends on chemical potential; whether or not there exists dynamical chiral symmetric breaking; whether or not the boson can acquires nonzero mass. In this paper, we give an in sight of the traits of QED3 from the dependence of density, temperature and massive boson to discuss those problems.

FENG Hongtao. Several Controversial Issues of QED3[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 13-15. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.013
Citation: FENG Hongtao. Several Controversial Issues of QED3[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 13-15. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.013
Reference (16)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return