Advanced Search
Volume 34 Issue 1
Jan.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

GU Jianzhong, PENG Bangbao, LI Zhenyu, YU Guoliang. Decay Out of Superdeformed Bands in 190,192Pb[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 57-61. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.057
Citation: GU Jianzhong, PENG Bangbao, LI Zhenyu, YU Guoliang. Decay Out of Superdeformed Bands in 190,192Pb[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 57-61. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.057

Decay Out of Superdeformed Bands in 190,192Pb

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.057
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China(11275271); Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11321064)
  • Received Date: 2016-09-01
  • Publish Date: 2017-03-20
  • The combined method is applied to calculate the angular momentum projected potential energy surfaces (AMPPES) of 190,192Pb. The Supper-deformed(SD) rotational bands of the two nuclei are studied with the AMPPES computed with the Gogny D1S and Skyrme SkP and SLy4 interactions. It is found that there is no pronounced SD band in 190Pb in the case of the Gogny interaction, which is consistent with the experimental observation. A well developed SD band with the Gogny interaction is found in 192Pb. The tunneling width of 192Pb is comparable to that given by the GW approach (Nucl. Phys. A 660 (1999)197) and orders of magnitude larger than that given by the SB approach (Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 051305). The influence of the angular momentum projection on the potential energy surfaces is examined in the case of the Gogny interaction for 190,192Pb. It is shown that the angular momentum projection suppresses the barrier separating the SD and ND rotational bands. Higher barriers of the AMPPESs for the two nuclei computed with the Skyrme SkP and SLy4 interactions are obtained compared with those given by the Gogny force. The tunneling width of 192Pb is also big for the Skyrme interactions. We put the SB approach into question which gives only an extremely small spreading width.
  • [1] TWIN P J, NYAKO B M, NELSON A H, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 1986, 57: 811.
    [2] SINGH B, ZYWINA R, FIRESTONe R B. Nucl Data Sheets, 2002, 97: 241.
    [3] GU J Z, WEIDENMÜLLER H A. Nucl Phys A, 1999, 660: 197.
    [4] SARGEANT A J, HUSSEIN M S, PATO M P, et al. 2002, Phys Rev C, 2002, 65: 024302.
    [5] WILSON A N, SARGEANT A J, DAVIDSON P M, et al. Phys Rev C, 2005, 71: 034319.
    [6] WILSON A N, SINGH A K, HUEBEL H, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 95: 182501.
    [7] WILSON A N, SZIGETI S S, DAVIDSON P M, et al. Phys Rev C, 2009, 79: 014312.
    [8] WILSON A N, KORICHI A, SIEM S, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 104: 162501.
    [9] CHIARA C J, SARANTITES D G, MONTERO M, et al. Phys Rev C, 2006, 73: R021301.
    [10] WEIDENMÜLLER H A, MITCHELL G E. Rev Mod Phys, 2009, 81: 539.
    [11] ZOU Wenhua, TIAN Yuan, GU Jianzhong, et al. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82: 024309.
    [12] GU Jianzhong, PENG Bangbao, ZOU Wenhua, et al. Nucl Phys A, 2010, 834: 87c.
    [13] GAFFNEY L P, HACKSTEIN M, PAGE R D, et al. Phys Rev C, 2014, 89: 024307.
    [14] BREE N, WRZOSEK-LIPSKA K, PETTS A, et al. 2014, Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 112: 162701.
    [15] ESTEVEZ AGUADO M E, ALGORA A, AGRAMUNT J, et al. Phys Rev C, 2015, 92: 044321.
    [16] VIGEZZI E, BROGLIA R A, D SSING T. Nucl Phys A, 1990, 520: 179C.
    [17] SHIMZU Y R, MATSUO M, YOSHIDA K. Nucl Phys A, 2001, 682: 464c; YOSHIDA K, MATSUO M, SHIMZU Y R. ibid. 2001, 696: 85.
    [18] STAFFORD C A, BARRETT B R. Phys Rev C, 1999, 60: 051305.
    [19] CARDAMONE D, BARRETT B R, STAFFORD C A. Phys Lett B, 2008, 661: 233.
    [20] CARDAMONE D, STAFFORD C A, BARRETT B R. Phys Rev Lett, 2003, 91: 102502.
    [21] BARRETT B R, BUERKI J, CARDAMONE D, et al, Phys Lett B, 2003, 688: 110.
    [22] DZYUBLIK A, UTYUZH V. Phys Rev C, 2003, 68: 024311.
    [23] ADAMIAN G G, ANTONENKO N V, JOLOS R V, et al. Phys Rev C, 2003, 67: 054303; ibid. 2004, 69: 054310.
    [24] GU J Z. Int J Mod Phys E, 2008, 17: 292.
    [25] ABERG S, Phys Rev Lett, 1999, 82: 299.
    [26] BERGER J, GIROD M, GOGNY D. Nucl Phys A, 1984, 428: 32c.
    [27] BONCHE P, DOBACZEWSKI J, FLOCARD H, et al. Nucl Phys A, 1990, 519: 509.
    [28] HARA K, SUN Y. Int J Mod Phys E, 1995, 4: 637.
    [29] HARA K, SUN Y, Mizusaki T. Phys Rev Lett, 1999, 83: 1922.
    [30] SUN Y, WALKER P, XU F R, et al. Phys Lett B, 2008, 659: 165.
    [31] LAURITSEN T, BENET P, KHOO T L, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 1992, 69: 2479.
    [32] KRÜCKEN R, DEWALD A, VON BRENTANO P, et al. Phys Rev C, 1996, 54: 1182.
    [33] RODRIGUEZ-GUZMAN R R, EGIDO J L, ROBLEDO L M. Phys Rev C, 2004, 69: 054319.
    [34] STOITSOV M V, DOBACZEWSKI J, NAZAREWICZ W, et al. Computer Physics Communication, 2005, 167: 43.
    [35] YAO J M, BENDER M, HEENEN P H. Phys Rev C, 2013, 87: 034322.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1451) PDF downloads(108) Cited by()

Proportional views

Decay Out of Superdeformed Bands in 190,192Pb

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.057
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China(11275271); Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11321064)

Abstract: The combined method is applied to calculate the angular momentum projected potential energy surfaces (AMPPES) of 190,192Pb. The Supper-deformed(SD) rotational bands of the two nuclei are studied with the AMPPES computed with the Gogny D1S and Skyrme SkP and SLy4 interactions. It is found that there is no pronounced SD band in 190Pb in the case of the Gogny interaction, which is consistent with the experimental observation. A well developed SD band with the Gogny interaction is found in 192Pb. The tunneling width of 192Pb is comparable to that given by the GW approach (Nucl. Phys. A 660 (1999)197) and orders of magnitude larger than that given by the SB approach (Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 051305). The influence of the angular momentum projection on the potential energy surfaces is examined in the case of the Gogny interaction for 190,192Pb. It is shown that the angular momentum projection suppresses the barrier separating the SD and ND rotational bands. Higher barriers of the AMPPESs for the two nuclei computed with the Skyrme SkP and SLy4 interactions are obtained compared with those given by the Gogny force. The tunneling width of 192Pb is also big for the Skyrme interactions. We put the SB approach into question which gives only an extremely small spreading width.

GU Jianzhong, PENG Bangbao, LI Zhenyu, YU Guoliang. Decay Out of Superdeformed Bands in 190,192Pb[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 57-61. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.057
Citation: GU Jianzhong, PENG Bangbao, LI Zhenyu, YU Guoliang. Decay Out of Superdeformed Bands in 190,192Pb[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(1): 57-61. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.01.057
Reference (35)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return