ZHANG Pengming, SUN Qing, Sergei P. Maydanyuk. Multiple Internal Re ections Method in Analysis of Nuclear Reactions[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(2): 148-153. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.02.148
Citation:
|
ZHANG Pengming, SUN Qing, Sergei P. Maydanyuk. Multiple Internal Re ections Method in Analysis of Nuclear Reactions[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(2): 148-153. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.02.148
|
Multiple Internal Re ections Method in Analysis of Nuclear Reactions
- 1.
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
- 2.
Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev 03680, Ukraine
Funds:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(11575254)
- Received Date: 2016-11-16
- Rev Recd Date:
2016-12-05
- Publish Date:
2017-06-20
-
Abstract
In this paper we give a short review of the Method of Multiple of Internal Reflections (MIR method), which is accepted as the more accurate and rich in quantum description of nuclear reactions today. For a capture of the α particles by nuclei our approach gives (1) new parameters of the α-nucleus potential and (2) new fusion probabilities. We demonstrate that a fully quantum description of this process provided by the MIR method, and inclusion of probabilities of fusion into formalism allow to essentially increase agreement between theory and experimental data. In particular, our method found new parametrization and fusion probabilities and decreased the error by 41.72 times for α+40Ca and 34.06 times for α+44Ca in a description of experimental data in comparison with existing results. Based on our proposed fusion probability formula, we explain the difference between experimental cross-sections for α+40Ca and α+44Ca, which is connected with the theory of coexistence of the spherical and deformed shapes in the ground state for nuclei near the neutron magic shell N =20. To obtain deeper insight into the physics of nuclei with the new discovered magic number N = 26, we predict new cross-section of α+46Ca for further experimental confirmation.
-
References
[1]
|
BALANTEKIN A B, TAKIGAWA N. Rev Mod Phys, 1998,70: 77. |
[2]
|
DENISOV V YU, KHUDENKO A A. Data Tables, 2009,95(6): 815. |
[3]
|
Available from: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov, http://wwwnds.iaea.org/RIPL-2. |
[4]
|
AUDI G, BERSILLON O, BLACHOT J, et al. Nucl Phys A,2003, 729(1): 3. |
[5]
|
MAYDANYUK S P, ZHANG P M, BELCHIKOV S V. Nucl Phys A, 2015, 940: 89; arXiv: 1504.00567. |
[6]
|
OLKHOVSKY V S, MAYDANYUK S P. Ukr Phys Journ,2000, 45(10): 1262, nucl-th/0406035; MAYDANYUK S P,OLKHOVSKY V S, ZAICHENKO A K. Journ Phys Stud,2002, 6(1): 1; nucl-th/0407108. |
[7]
|
CARDONE F, MAIDANYUK S P, MIGNANI R, et al.Found Phys Lett, 2006, 19(5): 441. |
[8]
|
MAYDANYUK S P, BELCHIKOV S V. Journ Mod Phys,2011, 2(6): 572, Journ Phys Stud, 2011, 15(4), 40. |
[9]
|
EBERHARD K A, APPEL C, BANGERT R, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 1979, 43(2): 107. |
[10]
|
DENISOV V YU, IKEZOE H. Phys Rev C, 2005, 72(5):064613, arXiv: nucl-th/0510082. |
[11]
|
PENIONZHKEVICH YU E, LUKYANOV S M. Phys Part Nucl, 2006, 37: 240. |
-
-
Proportional views
-