Advanced Search
Volume 34 Issue 3
Jul.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

QIAN Jing, GE Zhigang, LIU Tingjin, LU Hanlin, ZHOU Zuying, RUAN Xichao, CHEN Guochang, WANG Zhaohui, NIE Yangbo, WU Haicheng. Research on Discrepancy of Inelastic Cross Section for 56Fe in Fast Neutron Range[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(3): 514-519. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.03.514
Citation: QIAN Jing, GE Zhigang, LIU Tingjin, LU Hanlin, ZHOU Zuying, RUAN Xichao, CHEN Guochang, WANG Zhaohui, NIE Yangbo, WU Haicheng. Research on Discrepancy of Inelastic Cross Section for 56Fe in Fast Neutron Range[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(3): 514-519. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.03.514

Research on Discrepancy of Inelastic Cross Section for 56Fe in Fast Neutron Range

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.03.514
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (11505294)
  • Received Date: 2016-12-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2017-07-18
  • Knowledge about the inelastic scattering cross section of 56Fe is very important in neutron transportation calculation. However there are great discrepancies not only between experimental data but also between evaluated data. More detail analysis was performed for inelastic scattering cross section in the fast range up to 20 MeV where there are significant differences among the main evaluated libraries, mainly caused by the different inelastic scattering cross section measurements. The large discrepancies on 56Fe(n, n1'γ) cross section which could fill the neutron energy blank of the 56Fe(n,inl) were clarified and were converted to the inelastic scattering cross section of 56Fe. And the high-quality results were evaluated by using the unitarity constrain among total cross section, noelastic reaction and other reactions. The integral experiment result indicates that the new evaluated result of inelastic cross section brings greater improvement than that of CENDL-3.1.
  • [1] CHADWICK M B, DUPONT E, BAUGE E, et al. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2014, 118, 1.
    [2] WENNER M, HAGHIGHAT A, ADAMS J M, et al. Nucl Sci Eng, 2012, 170, 207.
    [3] CHADWICK M B, HERMAN M, OBLOZINSKY P, et al. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2011, 112, 2887.
    [4] KONING A J, FORREST R, KELLETT M, et al. JEFF Report 21, 2006, NEA No.6190.
    [5] KONING A J, DEAN C, FISCHER U, et al. JEFF Report 23, 2013, NEA No.7079.
    [6] SHIBATA K, IWAMOTO O, NAKAGAWA T, et al. J. Nucl Sci Tech, 2011, 48:1.
    [7] GE Z G, ZHAO Z X, XIA H H, et al. J Korean Phys Soc, 2011, 59(2):1052.
    [8] IAEA http://www-nds.iaea.org/EXFOR.
    [9] DICKENS J K, FU C Y, HETRICK D M, et al. Proc lnt Conf Jiilich, Germany, 1991, 13-17 May.
    [10] NELSON R O, FOTIADES N, DEVLIN M, et al. International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, 2004, PART ONE, 769:838.
    [11] LISOWSKI P W, BOWMAN C D, RUSSELL G J, et al. Nucl Sci Eng, 1990, 106:208.
    [12] NEGRET A, BORCEA C, DESSAGNE PH, et al. Phys Rev C, 2014, 90:034602.
    [13] BEYER R, SCHWENGNER R, HANNASKE R, et al. Phys Rev A, 2014, 927:41.
    [14] VONACH H, PAVLIK A, TAGESEN S, et al. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992:906.
    [15] ZOLOTAREV K I, International Nuclear Data Committee, 2002, CCCP-438.
    [16] SCHMIDT D, MANNHART W, KLEIN H, et al. Phys Techn Bundesanset, 1994, Neutronenphysik Reports No.20.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1236) PDF downloads(146) Cited by()

Proportional views

Research on Discrepancy of Inelastic Cross Section for 56Fe in Fast Neutron Range

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.03.514
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (11505294)

Abstract: Knowledge about the inelastic scattering cross section of 56Fe is very important in neutron transportation calculation. However there are great discrepancies not only between experimental data but also between evaluated data. More detail analysis was performed for inelastic scattering cross section in the fast range up to 20 MeV where there are significant differences among the main evaluated libraries, mainly caused by the different inelastic scattering cross section measurements. The large discrepancies on 56Fe(n, n1'γ) cross section which could fill the neutron energy blank of the 56Fe(n,inl) were clarified and were converted to the inelastic scattering cross section of 56Fe. And the high-quality results were evaluated by using the unitarity constrain among total cross section, noelastic reaction and other reactions. The integral experiment result indicates that the new evaluated result of inelastic cross section brings greater improvement than that of CENDL-3.1.

QIAN Jing, GE Zhigang, LIU Tingjin, LU Hanlin, ZHOU Zuying, RUAN Xichao, CHEN Guochang, WANG Zhaohui, NIE Yangbo, WU Haicheng. Research on Discrepancy of Inelastic Cross Section for 56Fe in Fast Neutron Range[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(3): 514-519. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.03.514
Citation: QIAN Jing, GE Zhigang, LIU Tingjin, LU Hanlin, ZHOU Zuying, RUAN Xichao, CHEN Guochang, WANG Zhaohui, NIE Yangbo, WU Haicheng. Research on Discrepancy of Inelastic Cross Section for 56Fe in Fast Neutron Range[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(3): 514-519. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.34.03.514
Reference (16)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return