Advanced Search

XIN Wenyu, ZHANG Ningtao, XU Yi, AN Zhu, BAI Fan, LIN Weiping, TANG Xiaodong, WANG Peng, XU Shiwei. Study of the Systematic Errors Introduced by the Statistical Model in the Measurement of 12C+13C Fusion Reaction[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(3): 289-293. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.03.289
Citation: XIN Wenyu, ZHANG Ningtao, XU Yi, AN Zhu, BAI Fan, LIN Weiping, TANG Xiaodong, WANG Peng, XU Shiwei. Study of the Systematic Errors Introduced by the Statistical Model in the Measurement of 12C+13C Fusion Reaction[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(3): 289-293. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.03.289

Study of the Systematic Errors Introduced by the Statistical Model in the Measurement of 12C+13C Fusion Reaction

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.03.289
Funds:  Natural Science Foundation of China(11405226, 11475228, 11805138, 1110Y701010)
  • Received Date: 2019-05-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-05-27
  • Publish Date: 2019-09-20
  • The online γ-rays and activity decay of 24Na residual produced in the 12C+13C reaction are both measured using thick and thin targets in the center-of-mass energy of 4~6 MeV. The total fusion cross section is derived from the γ-ray yields using the theoretical correction calculated by TALYS. Comparing the cross sections obtained by different methods in previous experiments, the systematic errors in the total cross section determination by branching the online γ-ray yields and the 24Na channel cross section are both determined to be 14%.
  • [1] HILLEBRANDT W, NIEMEYER J. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys, 2000, 522:53.
    [2] GASQUES L R, BROWN E F, CHIEFFI A, et al. Phys Rev C, 2007, 76:035802.
    [3] SPILLANE T, ROMANO M, SCHWEITZER J, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2007, 98:122501.
    [4] BARNES C A, TRENTALANGE S, WU S C. Treatise on heavy-ion science[M]. New York:Plenum Press, 1985:3-60.
    [5] UMAR A S, OBERACKER V E, HOROWITZ C J. Phys Rev C, 2012, 85:055801.
    [6] DIZA-TORRES A, WIESCHER M. Phys Rev C, 2018, 97:055802.
    [7] AGUILERA E F, MARTINEZ-QUIROZ E, ROSALES P, et al. Phys Rev C, 2006, 73:064601.
    [8] JIANG C L, SANTIAGO-GONZALEZ D, ALMARAZCALDERON S, et al. Phys Rev C, 2018, 97:012801(R).
    [9] BACK B B, ESBENSEN H, JIANG C L, et al. Rev Mod Phys, 2014, 86:317.
    [10] ESBENSEN H, TANG X, JIANG C L. Phys Rev C, 201184:064613.
    [11] JIANG C L, BACK B B, ESBENSEN H, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2013, 110:072701.
    [12] NOTANI M, ESBENSEN H, FANG X, et al. Phys Rev C, 2012, 85:014607.
    [13] ZHANG N T, TANG X D, CHEN H, et al. EPJ Science, C, 2016, 109:09003.
    [14] DAYRAS R, STOKSTAD R, SWITKOWSKI Z, et al. Nucl Phys A, 1976, 265:153.
    [15] DASMAHAPATRA B, CUJEC B, LAHLOU F. Nucl Phys A, 1982, 384:257.
    [16] HAN J F, AN Z, ZHENG G Q, et al. Nucl Instr and Meth B, 2018, 418:68.
    [17] ZHANG N T, FANG Y D, GOMES P R S, et al. Phys Rev C, 2014, 90:024621.
    [18] ZICKEFOOSE J. 12C+12C Fusion Measurement and Advances Toward the Gamow Energy[D]. Storrs:University of Connecticut, 2011:119-120. Doctoral Dissertation AAI3485448.
    [19] HAUSER W, FESHBACH H. Phys Rev, 1952, 87:366.
    [20] http://www.talys.eu/home/.
    [21] CAPOTE R, HERMAN M, OBLOZINSKY P, et al. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2009, 110(12):3107-3214.
    [22] KONING A J, DELAROCHE J P. Nucl Phys A, 2003, 713:231.
    [23] CHEN Z J, ZHANG N T, LI Q T, et al. Nuclear Physics Review, 2017, 34(4):705. (in Chinese). (陈治均, 张宁涛, 李奇特, 等. 原子核物理评论, 2017, 34(4):705.)
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1113) PDF downloads(77) Cited by()

Proportional views

Study of the Systematic Errors Introduced by the Statistical Model in the Measurement of 12C+13C Fusion Reaction

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.03.289
Funds:  Natural Science Foundation of China(11405226, 11475228, 11805138, 1110Y701010)

Abstract: The online γ-rays and activity decay of 24Na residual produced in the 12C+13C reaction are both measured using thick and thin targets in the center-of-mass energy of 4~6 MeV. The total fusion cross section is derived from the γ-ray yields using the theoretical correction calculated by TALYS. Comparing the cross sections obtained by different methods in previous experiments, the systematic errors in the total cross section determination by branching the online γ-ray yields and the 24Na channel cross section are both determined to be 14%.

XIN Wenyu, ZHANG Ningtao, XU Yi, AN Zhu, BAI Fan, LIN Weiping, TANG Xiaodong, WANG Peng, XU Shiwei. Study of the Systematic Errors Introduced by the Statistical Model in the Measurement of 12C+13C Fusion Reaction[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(3): 289-293. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.03.289
Citation: XIN Wenyu, ZHANG Ningtao, XU Yi, AN Zhu, BAI Fan, LIN Weiping, TANG Xiaodong, WANG Peng, XU Shiwei. Study of the Systematic Errors Introduced by the Statistical Model in the Measurement of 12C+13C Fusion Reaction[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(3): 289-293. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.03.289
Reference (23)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return