Advanced Search
Volume 36 Issue 4
Mar.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

LI Li, ZHANG Yingxun, CUI Ying, LI Zhuxia, CHEN Xiang. Impact Parameter Smearing and Its Influence on Heavy Ion Collision Observables[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(4): 400-407. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.04.400
Citation: LI Li, ZHANG Yingxun, CUI Ying, LI Zhuxia, CHEN Xiang. Impact Parameter Smearing and Its Influence on Heavy Ion Collision Observables[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(4): 400-407. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.04.400

Impact Parameter Smearing and Its Influence on Heavy Ion Collision Observables

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.04.400
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (11875323, 11875125, 11475262, 11365004, 11375062, 11790323, 11790324, 11790325, 11961141003);National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0404404)
  • Received Date: 2019-09-29
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-11-19
  • Publish Date: 2019-12-20
  • Based on the Improved Quantum Molecular Dynamics model (ImQMD), the difference of central collision in experiment and theory for low-intermediate energy heavy ion collisions is investigated. By analyzing the two kinds of central collisions, we find there is 50% difference on the charge distribution, and also on its average kinetic energy for heavier fragments, especially at the beam energy of 50 MeV/u. While, for the coalescence invariant neutron proton yield ratio, the calculations show there are about 5% ~ 15% difference. Our results evidence that the impact parameter smearing effects must be considered for tightly constraining the nuclear equation of state and the in-medium nucleon-nucleon cross sections by heavy ion collision.
  • [1] HUDAN S, CHIBIHI A, FRANKLAND J D, et al. Phys Rev C, 2003, 67:064613.
    [2] TSANG M B, BERTSCH G F, LYNCH W G, et al. Phys Rev C, 1989, 40:1685.
    [3] REISDOLF W, BEST D, GOBBI A, et al. Nucl Phys A, 1997, 612:493.
    [4] ZHANG Y, COUPLAND D D S, DANIELEWICZ P, et al. Phys Rev C, 2015, 85, 024602.
    [5] LIU T X, LYNCH W G, TSANG M B, et al. Phys Rev C, 2007, 76:11603.
    [6] ZHANG Y, TSANG M B, LI Z, et al. Phys Lett B, 2014, 732:186.
    [7] TSANG M B, LIU T X, SHI L, et al. Phys Rev Lett, 2004, 92:062701.
    [8] ZHANG Y, LU X, ZHAO K, et al. Nuclear Physics Review, 2011, 28(4):377.(in Chinese)(张英逊,卢晓华,赵凯,等.原子核物理评论, 2011, 28(4):377.)
    [9] LUKASIK J, BENLLIURE J, METIVIER V, et al. Phys Rev C, 1997, 55:1906.
    [10] PLAGNOL E, LUKASIK J, AUGER G, et al. Phys Rev C, 2000, 61:014606.
    [11] LECOLLEY J F, STUTTGE L, ABOUFIRASSI M, et al. Phys Lett B, 1994, 325:317.
    [12] CAVATA C, DEMOULINS M, GOSSET J, et al. Phys Rev C, 1990, 42:1760.
    [13] OGILVIE C A, CEBRA D A, CLAYTON J, et al. Phys Rev C, 1989, 40:654.
    [14] STONE J R, MILLER J C, KONCEWICZ R, et al. Phys Rev C, 2003, 68:034324.
    [15] CHABANAT E, BONCHE P, HAENSEL, et al. Nucl Phys A, 1997, 627:710.
    [16] ZHANG Y, LI Z, et al. Phys Rev C, 2006, 74:014602.
    [17] LI Q, LI Z. Mod Phys Lett A, 2002, 17:375.
    [18] LI L, ZHANG Y, LI Z, et al. Phys Rev C, 2018, 97:044606.
    [19] LI B A, KO C M, REN Z. Phys Rev Lett, 1997, 78:1644.
    [20] LI B A. Phys Rev Lett, 2002, 88, 192701.
    [21] XIE W J, SU J, ZHU L, et al. Phys Rev C, 2013, 88:061601(R).
    [22] COUPLAND D D S, YOUNGS M, CHAJECKI Z, et al. Phys Rev C, 2016, 94:011601(R).
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(1556) PDF downloads(46) Cited by()

Proportional views

Impact Parameter Smearing and Its Influence on Heavy Ion Collision Observables

doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.04.400
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (11875323, 11875125, 11475262, 11365004, 11375062, 11790323, 11790324, 11790325, 11961141003);National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0404404)

Abstract: Based on the Improved Quantum Molecular Dynamics model (ImQMD), the difference of central collision in experiment and theory for low-intermediate energy heavy ion collisions is investigated. By analyzing the two kinds of central collisions, we find there is 50% difference on the charge distribution, and also on its average kinetic energy for heavier fragments, especially at the beam energy of 50 MeV/u. While, for the coalescence invariant neutron proton yield ratio, the calculations show there are about 5% ~ 15% difference. Our results evidence that the impact parameter smearing effects must be considered for tightly constraining the nuclear equation of state and the in-medium nucleon-nucleon cross sections by heavy ion collision.

LI Li, ZHANG Yingxun, CUI Ying, LI Zhuxia, CHEN Xiang. Impact Parameter Smearing and Its Influence on Heavy Ion Collision Observables[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(4): 400-407. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.04.400
Citation: LI Li, ZHANG Yingxun, CUI Ying, LI Zhuxia, CHEN Xiang. Impact Parameter Smearing and Its Influence on Heavy Ion Collision Observables[J]. Nuclear Physics Review, 2019, 36(4): 400-407. doi: 10.11804/NuclPhysRev.36.04.400
Reference (22)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return